Institutional Web Managers Workshop – 2009

Are you being served? - a guest blogpost for IWMW 2009 – University of Essex, July 2009

No this is not a post about a cat! It’s an introduction to some thinking that Joe Nicholls (@joenicholls) and I have been articulating over the past couple of years which has culminated in the presentation that Joe will be leading you through on Wednesday morning.

It all started with a blog post which I wrote back in 2007 entitled Information Services 2.0, the debate then was about whether disruptive technologies would sound the death-knell of the central IT Services department. There’re are a few links on this re-posting of the original that might be of interest – a certain Brian Kelly was the ring-master of this debate … what changes I hear you say! I argued then, as I do still strongly now that you can’t use the term ‘disruptive technologies’ in the enterprise if you want to effect cultural change and business process improvement through use of Web 2.0 technologies, a point I returned to again quite recently in a post entitled Emergent Enterprise (and disruptive technologies). So that’s the background, where’s this thinking taking us?

In our presentation we will show how central services, not just IT Services but any service function within a University or indeed within any enterprise, need to re-evaluate what their role and function is, or should be, in a world where the pace of change is far quicker outside the enterprise than it ever can hope to be inside the enterprise. What is the role of the central services function? Is it to provide corporate services – or are these now commodities that can be consumed from the cloud? Is it to provide a packaged solution to the desktop – or are the users now ahead of the service in knowing what their requirements are? Does the role of the central IT service just collapse down into one of being the guardian of the corporate information store – or is there an alternative, extremely challenging but yet potentially exciting new world out there?

It is our contention that we need to re-address the balance between the technology that the IT Service provides and the education package (usually called training – and the use of that term in itself speaks volumes of how we perceive it’s place in our service offering) that is offered to our users – usually as an adjunct to the corporate service offering.

A number of threads thus emerge – some of which I intend to return to in later postings. The most important of these in many ways is the process of actively engaging in requirements gathering. What is it that users of technology actually want? [By the way using the term “users” becomes quite acceptable now as they are “users of technology” as apposed to being users of our services when we truly put in them in the category of customers, or consumers.]

To do this requires that we actively and passionately pursue a strategy of partnership with the community of technology users; we need to much more fully understand what it is that they want to do; how they might go about doing it; and then assist them in determining the most appropriate technology to achieve their objectives.

From this, the approach becomes one of enablement rather than provision. We are there to assist the user in getting maximum benefit from the technology they employ to achieve their objectives – not to tell them how to use this corporate offering or the other one! It’s a subtle but real change in emphasis. We must move into the space of enabling users wherever they happen technologically to be, whatever the tools they are using, not servicing users.

To move from a service focus (in our traditional central IT Service view of the word service) to an enablement focus requires some courage, requires us to throw away some of the comfort blanket of technology provision we love so much, and requires us to focus clearly on education as opposed to training.

The threads and themes that stream from this are ones such as “appropriate use”, “keeping yourself safe”, “digital identity” and perhaps most importantly from the enterprise’s point of view – the distinction between corporate information and private information and how they are handled in the world of Enterprise 2.0. The ideas associated with governance become central here and that is something Joe and I intend to now focus upon.

Blogging at Conferences

Just a quick note to self, more than anything else. Whilst at the Gartner ITExpo2008 Symposium in Barcelona I was using Windows Live Writer to blog, and this worked very well. I was able to take notes in sessions in real-time where there was no wireless and as it was being saved on my laptop, as long as I had electric power – no problem. What I made the mistake of doing was publishing the blogs as soon as I had wireless connectivity – almost as if I was frightened I’d lose the pearls I’d written.

What I had forgotten to do, was “engage brain”. Therefore, I’ve found myself editing like mad this weekend, adding links and reconstituting the larger posts into smaller more subject-focussed ones. Therefore my twitterfriends (because I forgot to switch-off twitterfeed) have been bombarded by blogging that is more akin to bragging, or blagging even. My apologies to them.

The lesson to myself is that blogging is like any piece of document production. Consider the audience and what they might want to read. Have a structure for the post(s) that meets the requirement of the audience. Don’t publish until it’s finished. My excitement at being able to do it, overcame the good sense of knowing when an what to do.

Web2.0 serendipity

An earlier post reflected upon my impressions and experience of presenting at the Eduserv Symposium in London. Now I want to spend a few moments describing how the virtual and real worlds can collide and produce synergy and promote activity that would not have happened in any other circumstance, or at least not so forcefully.

I’ve explained how the event was being streamed on the web, and how CoverItLive was being used to provide a live micro-blogging channel so that participants and attendees could take part in a discourse with the presenters and conference organisers. What perhaps was not obvious was that some of us were also using Twitter as a separate back-channel (sometimes also using Direct Messaging) which allowed us to communicate together using the hashtag #efsym2008.

What I want to describe is how a communication on the back-channel at that event led to lunch today with a colleague from our School of Journalism, Media & Cultural Studies (JOMEC) – “@egrommet” – and then on to discussions on how we could use the Collaboration Tools within our Modern IT Working Environment (MWE) to affect change in the way we work and the way we deliver learning and teaching at the University as well as the possibilities for partnership between Information Services (INSRV) and JOMEC. On CoverItLive it looked like this …

12:19
Pete Johnston – OK, slight reorganisation, so next up is Geoffrey Bilder from CrossRef
12:20
[Comment From David Harrison]
Would be good to be able to identify actual from virtual attendees
12:25
[Comment From David Harrison]
Great start – hits at stuff we’ve been talking about in Cardiff in terms of trust/credibility
12:25
[Comment From egrommet]
@David Harrison I’m a virt
12:26
[Comment From egrommet]
@David Harrison – where do you work, I’m Cardiff Uni
12:29
[Comment From David Harrison]
@egronmet – real – INSRV in CU
12:29
[Comment From egrommet]
lol

… colleagues of mine who were also following the event on CoverItLive then advised me through Twitter who @egrommet was and by the end of the event we were “following” each other on Twitter, had effectively brought two parts of the University together and had agreed we needed to meet up to chat more about our respective areas of work and interests.

The upshot of all this is that today we discussed the use of socialmedia in Journalism, the structure of blogs/wikis and other collaboration tools that will very shortly be available in the MWE, some ideas of creating a team blog for those in the School interested in technology, and an exchange of contact details of others working in this area that I might be interested in following and most important to me the knowledge that we had the possibility of a partner who would work closely with us to achieve benefit and start to change the way we do things in the University. So really the subtitle of the talk, “making sense out of nonsense” couldn’t have been more apt. The real learning point is however that social software (whatever you call it), or Web 2.0 opens up whole rafts of possibilities that you cannot imagine. It breaks down silos, it creates new communication pathways that are very direct, it creates new alliances, it puts like people in touch with each other and most importantly it fosters co-operation and collaboration.

When’s my next lunch … ?